Six Types of Love
In guide titled Colors of Love (1973), J. A. Lee defined six types of relationship that would be labeled love.
Eros is intimate, passionate, love–what Tennov labeled limerence. In this kind of relationship, love is life’s many thing that is important. Lee stated a look for real beauty or a perfect kind additionally typifies this sort of love.
Ludus is really a game-playing or love that is uncommitted. Lying is a component associated with the game. An individual who pursues love that is ludic have numerous conquests but remains uncommitted.
Storge (STORE-gay) is just a sluggish developing, friendship-based love. Individuals with this sort of love want to together participate in activities. Lee stated that storge leads to a term that is long for which intercourse may not be really intense or passionate.
Pragma is just a pragmatic, practical, mutually useful relationship. It might be notably unromantic and it is often referred to as “shopping list” love must be partner is chosen based on a number of faculties or demands. Intercourse may very well be regarded as a technical matter, required for creating young ones, if they’re desired.
Mania can be an obsessive or possessive love, jealous and extreme. An individual in love this means will probably make a move crazy or silly, such as for example stalking. The movie Fatal Attraction ended up being about it kind.
Agape (a-GOP-aye) is all-giving love, not worried about the self, just with the partner, or with individuals compassion that is needing. It is stated to be reasonably uncommon.
Hendrick and Hendrick (1986) discovered that Lee’s typology had been sustained by questionnaire research in 2 studies with 1,807 and 567 participants, correspondingly. “Six love design scales emerged demonstrably from element analysis” in both studies.
Just just What six several types of love did J. A. Lee define?
Hendrick and Hendrick (1986) produced a prefer personality Scale to identify the six kinds of love through questionnaire reactions. It had been utilized in the majority of the subsequent research on Lee’s love kinds. Here are a few test tiny shemale questionnaire products:
- Eros: “My partner and I also have actually just the right real chemistry between us. ” “we believe that my spouse and I had been intended for each other. ” “My partner fits my idea standard of real beauty/handsomeness. “
- Ludus: “We have often to help keep my partner from learning about other enthusiasts. ” “I am able to conquer love affairs pretty effortlessly and quickly. ” “we enjoy playing the overall game of love with my partner and a great many other lovers. “
- Storge: “Our love could be the most readily useful type given that it expanded away from an extended relationship. ” “Our love is truly a deep relationship, maybe not just a mysterious, mystical feeling. “
- Pragma: “a primary consideration in selecting my partner had been just just how she or he would think about my loved ones. ” “a significant factor in selecting my partner ended up being she will be an excellent moms and dad. Whether he or” “One consideration in selecting my partner ended up being how he/she would think on my profession. “
- Mania: “When my partner doesn’t focus on me personally, i’m unwell all over. ” “if We suspect that my partner is by using some other person. Since we ahve held it’s place in love with my partner, we have had difficulty centering on other things. ” “we cannot flake out”
- Agape: “I would personally rather suffer myself than allow my partner experience. ” “I may not be delighted unless I destination my partner’s delight before my own. ” “I would personally endure everything in the interests of my partner. “
Lee predicted males would endorse Ludus more often. Initially that appeared to be verified, as Hendrick, Slapion-Foote, and Foote (1985) stated that guys had been very likely to show the type that is ludic of, while females were more prone to be storgic or pragmatic.
Nonetheless, Woll (1989) unearthed that “the sole loving style which revealed clear sex distinctions had been Eros, upon which men scored considerably more than females. ” Various other studies making use of the like personality Scale discovered no sex distinctions.
What have scientists discovered, in learning Lee’s six forms of love?
Couples cheerfully married for more than three decades commonly identify because of the Eros category. This may appear counter-intuitive if one equates eros with intimate attraction just, or with limerence.
Nevertheless, the appreciate personality Scale products for Eros emphasize passionate devotion more than intercourse. Maybe it is really not astonishing that long-married, pleased partners would endorse statements like, “we have been designed for one another. “
A study of 500 pupils in 2 of my introductory therapy classes indicated that the very first five kinds had been familiar to over 80% regarding the pupils from their very own relationships or individuals they knew. But, not as much as 10percent of students knew a person who indicated agape.
Which type of love had been minimum familiar to pupils in a basic therapy course?
Neto et al. (2000) reported research that is cross-cultural the like personality Scale. The authors hypothesized that “factors involving strong individual emotions, such as for instance mania, eros, and agape, will be mostly without any social distinctions” while “factors involving strict rules that are social. Such as for instance pragma, storge, and ludus, would be influenced by social influences. “
The authors surveyed 1,157 undergraduates, similarly split between women and men, at universities in Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, France, Macao, Mozambique, Portugal, and Switzerland. The outcome supported their hypotheses.
Kinds of love involving strong individual emotions had been comparable in every countries; “cross-cultural distinctions had been extremely moderate. ” But, pertaining to Pragma and Storge, “cross-cultural differences had been considerable. “
Angolans, Brazilians, Cape Verdians, and Mozambicans were more pragmatic than French and Swiss. The initial three of these national nations additionally produced more storgic responses than French or Swiss. “there have been differences that are few genders. “
Gana, Saada, and Untas (2013) were interested in which love designs might correlate with marital satisfaction. They learned 146 heterosexual partners. “the outcome revealed that one of the love styles, just Eros contributed to marital satisfaction for men and women. “
Sorry, comments are closed for this post.